Australia: To Rotate or not to Rotate?

The Aussie cricket team’s policy of rotating its players has come in under fire from former Aussie greats: Steve Waugh, Taylor, Chappell and others. However, I think they are doing the right thing. Firstly it makes no sense to play so many matches. It would be even crazier to have the same set of players play all of them. In particular, a team like Australia has enough bench strength to beat the finest teams in the world without playing their best team. Then why not experiment? After all this is not the World Cup they are playing for!

The Indian team’s rotation policy has done wonders for it. It has helped unearth some great talent. I think most teams can and must rotate their top players else they’ll get burnt out or be forced out by injuries.

SL fighting back!

SL won two successive matches in the VB series first beating SA and then Australia. For the first time in a long time SL put up a fighting 300+ total. The most heartening was the return of Jayasurya. If he can sustain this form SL’s problem of bad starts might be solved despite Attatpatu’s desire to hide in the lower middle order. The VB series should be interesting if SL can continue to win and put pressure on both SA and Aus.

Its a smart move by the Aussies to rotate their players no matter what Smith and Ranatunga say!

Second Test Day 3: Pak vs. India

The Indian team once again showed a lot of character by stepping up to the challenge of chasing a huge score. With this innings Dhoni has proven that he can adapt to Test cricket. If he can keep up his wicket-keeping standards he can be a fixture in the team for a very long time. Hats off to Pathan, Dravid and VVS. Dravid now has two centuries as opener!

Sachin once again failed when the team needed him to deliver (what as he thinking when he walked before the umpire’s decision?). A sign of how much has changed in Indian cricket. In a moment of crisis Indian fans hope for some Viru magic or some solidity from Dravid. A Sachin knock is only a bonus! Its nice to see the team no longer dependent on him.

I hope the pitch for the third Test suits the bowlers. I would hate to see another high scoring match which produces no result!

Second Test: Pak vs India

It was a great move on the part of the Indian think tank to go in with five bowlers. Even if India loses this Test they at least they went into this match with an intent to win. With four bowlers and a dead pitch India was not going to bowl Pak out twice.

R. P. Singh proved a decent bet right on the first day with three wickets. Agarakar is a joke in any case, so Zaheer can’t do worse. Irfan is a disappointment.

Pak on the other hand seems to have gone on the defensive by playing Abdul Razzack in place of Naved. Though he got thrashed in the first Test definitely Naved is better bowler. Mohammed Asif might be the surprise package that does it for Pak in this match just as Umar Gul did for Pak on India’s last tour.

Press, Records and Viru

The press and the cricket loving public are the first to fault any cricketer who is even remotely “record” sensitive. Yet notice that most of the major news outlets were so hard pressed for cricket news on the last day of the Lahore Test that most of them lead their new reports with the fact that the opening partnership record was missed. Its a little unfair to expect the players to be insensitive to records when at the slightest opportunity the media and the press are displaying records of all types all over the place. Poke around the leading cricket website and you’ll be amazed the kind of stats and data mining you can do there.

Btw, Ganguly claims his record is good! Maybe that’s why the selected him:-)

The most interesting piece I read was the news that Viru had never heard of Pankaj Roy or Vinoo Mankad! I hope this piece is authentic because it has quotes from Dilip Vengsarkar. (Normally I don’t trust this site because of the kind of stuff they publish!)

Impressive victory by SL

Finally, the Sri Lankan cricket team managed to win a match! What’s better is that they did it in style. I still think that the batting order is badly flawed. Considering the good start they should have crossed 300. Unfortunately, they were left with big hitters towards the end. Mubarak clicked partly because he had so many lives. He could be useful in the last 10 overs instead.

Sangakkara is still their mainstay. He clicks and they have a good chance. Attapattu must just open the batting with him on permanent bass in ODIs.

SL in bad shape

Sri Lanka’s performance of late has been pathetic. If this trend continues Tom Moody’s job as coach should be on the line pretty soon!

I simply don’t understand their batting order. Wasn’t Attapattu opening or going in at number 3 for so many years? He has played the anchor role while Jayasurya and others build their innings around him. Why is he running scared these days? He seems to be droppping down the order with every match! The batting order in my opinion should be as follows:

  1. Attapattu
  2. Sangakkara
  3. Jayawardene
  4. Tharanga
  5. Dilshan
  6. Arnold
  7. Mubarak
  8. Vaas
  9. Perrera
  10. Fernando
  11. Murali

First Test: Pak vs. India

Man, what a boring pitch! I wish they would start preparing Test match wickets which have something in it for bowlers! Its sickening to see one team bat first and pile up 600+ runs over two days. The only thing left in this match is a test of Indian batsmens’ ability to stick it out and save the Test. I remember many years back when India was going to play a Test match at Faisalabad, Lala Amarnath had commented, “Even if you play for 7 days on this pitch you won’t get a result!”

Ganguly should play in the first Test

There is a lot of speculation about whether Dada will make it to the playing eleven. Personally, I was not in favor of including Dada in the 15. But having done that, I think it makes sense to include him in the 11 in place of Yuvraj. Here are a few reasons why:

1. Dada can play Danish a lot better than Yuvraj.
2. He did a decent job scoring 144 in Adelaide when critics said the same thing about his weakness for fast bowling.
3. His medium pace could come in handy in the cold conditions.
4. If he flunks badly (scores poorly, gets others run out, field miserably etc.) he can be shown the door at the end of this series.
5. He won’t make the ODI team for sure, so let him have one last shot at redeeming himself. After all he has done a lot for Indian cricket. Many of the current team (ironically, including Yuvraj!) swore by him, at least until the winds changed!

Check out Imran’s excellent comments on the issue.

Tharanga strikes at last!

It was great to hear that Upul Tharanga finally made a big score. I saw him bat live on TV on the India tour and came way very impressed. He managed only a string of 20s ad 30s on that tour but his class was apparent even during those brief innings. He is a thin skinny guy but a delightful timer of the ball. He reminded me of David Gower. Hope we get to see more of him. I beleive he is a wicket keeper too!