Inzy is free of ball tampering charges. But he has to sit out four games. Darrell Hair has nothing to worry about. The match was long forfeited. Who compensates the public for the loss of a day and quarter of exciting play? If Inzy and co are not guilty of ball tampering, shouldn’t the Umpire be taken to task for depriving the public of some serious cricket?
Its probably the only instance where a serious charge was levelled against a cricket captain, hearing is held after several weeks and at the end of the investigation, everyone goes home smiling! A true win-win scenario.